Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpg53ZfB/PEANO_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(M)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → AND(isNat(M), isNat(N))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(0)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V1)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → ISNAT(V1)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(M)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V2)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → AND(isNat(M), isNat(N))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(0)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → ISNAT(V1)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → ISNAT(V1)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 20 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(active(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(mark(X)) → ISNAT(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ISNAT(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(active(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)
U21¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + (4)x_2 + (4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, mark(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(X1, active(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(active(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(U11¹(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, N)) → MARK(N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 3 + (3)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(tt) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x_1
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 3 + (2)x_1 + x_2
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = (2)x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2 + (3)x_3
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 4
POL(tt) = 3
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 2
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNat(X)) → ACTIVE(isNat(X))
ACTIVE(isNat(s(V1))) → MARK(isNat(V1))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(U11(isNat(N), N))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x_1
POL(tt) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + (2)x_2
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x_2
POL(isNat(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(U21(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 3 + (2)x_2 + x_3
POL(0) = 4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U21(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, N)) → mark(N)
active(U21(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isNat(0)) → mark(tt)
active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)))
active(isNat(s(V1))) → mark(isNat(V1))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(U11(isNat(N), N))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U21(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(isNat(X)) → active(isNat(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(active(X1), X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, active(X2), X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
U21(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNat(mark(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(active(X)) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.